Maize Genetics Cooperation Newsletter 80. 2006.

 

Mapping data for arv‑m694, Fcu‑R2003‑2653‑6, and Arv‑V628#16038 with respect to wx1 T2‑9d

‑‑Stinard, PS

 

       In 2004 (MNL 78:63-64), we reported the results of linkage tests of the mutable r1 haplotype-specific enhancers of aleurone color Fcu and arv‑m594 with respect to wx1 in a set of wx1 marked reciprocal translocations.  Tightest linkage with wx1 was obtained for both factors with the translocation wx1 T2‑9d (breakpoints 2L.83; 9L.27).  Since then, linkage data with respect to the chromosome 2 markers fl1, v4, w3, and Ch1 have further refined the position of Fcu on 2L (Stinard; this MNL), and the factors Fcu, arv‑m594, arv‑m694, Arv‑V628#16038, and Fcu‑R2003‑2653‑6 have been found to map to the same position (Stinard; this MNL).  In parallel, linkage crosses of arv‑m694, Fcu‑R2003‑2653‑6, and Arv‑V628#16038 were performed with wx1 T2‑9d, and the results are reported below.

       Linkage crosses were set up as indicated in Tables 1 (arv‑m694), 2 (Fcu‑R2003‑2653‑6), and 3 (Arv‑V628#16038).  Lines homozygous for enhancers were crossed to wx1 T2‑9d, and the resulting F1�s were outcrossed as males to tester lines homozygous for wx1 and the reporter haplotype R1‑r(Venezuela559‑ PI302355).  Kernels from the test cross ears were scored for waxy (wx) vs. starchy (Wx) endosperm and sectored (arv‑m) or full-colored (Fcu‑R or Arv) vs. stable pale (arv or fcu) aleurone.  The results and linkage values are reported in Tables 1, 2, and 3.

 

Table 1.  Two point linkage data for wx1 and arv‑m694 in crosses involving T2‑9d.  Data from four ears.

 

Testcross:  wx1 N arv R1‑r(Venezuela559‑PI302355) X [wx1 T arv r1 X Wx1 N arv‑m694 R1‑r(Venezuela694#16037)]

Region

Phenotype

No.

Totals

 

 

 

 

0

Wx arv‑m

265

 

 

wx arv

228

493

 

 

 

 

1

wx arv‑m

49

 

 

Wx arv

45

94

 

 

 

 

n

 

 

587

Map distance wx1arv‑m694 = 16.0 � 1.5 cM

 

Table 2.  Two point linkage data for wx1 and Fcu‑R2003‑2653‑6 in crosses involving T2‑9d.  Data from three ears.

 

Testcross:  wx1 N fcu R1‑r(Venezuela559‑PI302355) X [wx1 T fcu r1 X Wx1 N Fcu‑R2003‑2653‑6 R1‑r(Venezuela559‑PI302355)]

Region

Phenotype

No.

Totals

 

 

 

 

0

Wx Fcu‑R

153

 

 

wx fcu

155

308

 

 

 

 

1

wx Fcu‑R

15

 

 

Wx fcu

25

40

 

 

 

 

n

 

 

348

Map distance wx1Fcu‑R2003‑2653‑6 = 11.5 � 1.7 cM

 

Table 3.  Two point linkage data for wx1 and Arv‑V628#16038 in crosses involving T2‑9d.  Data from six ears.

 

Testcross:  wx1 N arv R1‑r(Venezuela559‑PI302355) X [wx1 T arv r1 X Wx1 N Arv‑V628#16038 r1‑g (Stadler)]

Region

Phenotype

No.

Totals

 

 

 

 

0

Wx Arv

356

 

 

wx arv

360

716

 

 

 

 

1

wx Arv

47

 

 

Wx arv

79

126

 

 

 

 

n

 

 

842

Map distance wx1Arv‑V628#16038 = 15.0 � 1.2 cM

 

       All three enhancers showed linkage with wx1 in crosses involving T2‑9d, although the map distances varied somewhat.  The values with respect to arv‑m694 (16.0 � 1.5 cM), Fcu‑R2003‑ 2653‑6 (11.5 � 1.7 cM), and Arv‑V628#16038 (15.0 � 1.2 cM) maybe be directly compared with those previously reported for Fcu (13.6 � 0.9 cM) and arv‑m594 (9.4 � 0.8 cM; MNL 78:63-64).  All five factors show little if any recombination with each other (Stinard, this MNL).  However, discrepancies between linkage values with respect to wx1 marked translocations are not unusual (EB Patterson, Ph.D. Dissertation, 1952) and could be due to differences in genetic background or environmental factors.

 

_________________________________________________

Please note: Notes submitted to the Maize Genetics Cooperation Newsletter may be cited only with consent of the authors.

Return to MNL 80 on-line index.

Return to MNL index.

Return to MaizeGDB home page

____________________________________________