--Michael G. Muszynski and Peter A. Peterson
The c2-m881058Y allele (MNL 64:9) was previously shown to be
non-autonomously controlled. To investigate the relationship to En(Spm),
this mutant was crossed to a colored wx line. The F1 (C2/c2-m
Wx/wx) was backcrossed to a c2/c2 wx-m8/wx-m8 tester . The results
from these crosses indicate that En was present. If En is
responsible for the c2-m mutability, then all spotted kernels should
also be wx-mutable (wx-m) and all colorless kernels should
be wx-stable (wx-st). If the En is unrelated
to the c2-m and another factor is controlling spotting, there should
then be no correlation between spots and wx mutability. The expected
results if En is unrelated and the observed results are summarized
as follows:
|
|
||||
En | Factor | c2-m | wx-m8 | c2-m | wx-m8 |
+ | + | sp | wx-m | sp | wx-m |
+ | - | cl | wx-m | cl | wx-m |
- | + | sp | wx-st | cl | wx-st |
- | - | cl | wx-st | cl | wx-st |
There are several interesting features here. All spotted kernels are
wx-mutable, but the presence of the colorless wx-mutable
class indicates that En alone is unable to trigger spotting. Further,
the lack of a spotted wx-stable class indicates that a separate
factor alone is also not able to trigger spotting. Therefore, this unstable
allele requires En and an independent factor. It may be jointly
controlled. This would be the first instance of three factor control (the
locus, En and a non-En factor) of mutability. Tests to confirm
this hypothesis are underway.
Return to the MNL 65 On-Line Index
Return to the Maize Newsletter Index
Return to the MaizeGDB Homepage