3. Most of our time and space this season was
devoted to determining on which chromosomes are located the multiple‑factor
segments which distinguish maize and teosinte. Relatively isogenic stocks,
homozygous for one or more multiple-factor segments, were produced by crossing
four varieties of teosinte with an inbred strain, backcrossing three times to
the same inbred, and selfing. These were then crossed to a nine‑gene
linkage tester and backcrossed to a second nine‑gene tester. The ears in
these populations were then classified with respect to presence or absence of
the multiple‑factor segments from teosinte. Such classifications are far
from completely accurate, because the effect of the segments vary with the
influence of several genes in the tester stock, especially j and g.
Linkages can be detected, however, even when the classification is purely
arbitrary, although exact crossing‑over percentages cannot be determined
from these particular studies. The results of these tests are shown in the
accompanying table. Analysis of the data was greatly simplified by the use of
McBee punched cards which can be sorted with a simple, inexpensive tumbler.
Table I. Summary of
linkage relations of the multiple‑factor
segments derived from four varieties of teosinte
Variety of teosinte |
Number of segments |
Linkage with chromosome number |
Total number chromosomes
tested |
||||||||
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Florida |
1 |
‑ |
‑ |
+ |
‑ |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1134 |
" |
1 |
‑ |
‑ |
+ |
‑ |
‑ |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1530 |
" |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
‑ |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1575 |
" |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
‑ |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1512 |
" |
2 |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
1512 |
" |
2 |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
‑ |
- |
- |
- |
- |
828 |
" |
2 |
- |
- |
I |
+ |
‑ |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1386 |
" |
2 |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
675 |
Summary |
12 |
+ |
- |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
10152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Durango |
1+ |
- |
- |
I |
+ |
‑ |
- |
- |
- |
- |
567 |
" |
1+ |
I |
- |
- |
+ |
‑ |
- |
- |
I |
‑ |
756 |
" |
2 |
+ |
I |
+ |
- |
- |
‑ |
- |
- |
- |
1305 |
" |
3 |
‑ |
‑ |
‑ |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1494 |
Summary |
7 |
+ |
‑ |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
4122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
I |
- |
I |
- |
1539 |
" |
1+ |
I |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
855 |
" |
2 |
I |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
I |
- |
- |
- |
1575 |
" |
2 |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
I |
- |
1440 |
Summary |
6 |
I |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
I |
- |
I |
- |
5409 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nobogame |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1359 |
" |
1 |
‑ |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
765 |
" |
2 |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
I |
- |
1521 |
" |
2 |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1602 |
Summary |
6 |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
I |
- |
5247 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grand Summary |
31 |
+ |
- |
+ |
+ |
- |
I |
- |
+ |
- |
24930 |
+ = Linkage
I = Indication of linkage
‑ = Independent inheritance
The important fact gained from this study is that the multiple-factor segments which distinguish maize and teosinte are located on chromosomes 1, 3, 4, and 9 in Florida and Durango teosintes. In Nobogame teosinte which had previously been shown to carry only three major segments, chromosomes 3, 4, and 9 are involved. In "New" teosinte chromosomes 3, 4, 9, and possibly 7 are involved. The remaining chromosomes appear to carry none of the major multiple‑factor segments which distinguish maize and teosinte. They are probably not lacking in genes which effect the various characters which distinguish the two species but these are either modifiers or segments too small to be detected by the methods followed in this experiment which depend wholly upon dominant or partially dominant effects.
It should be noted that chromosome 6 was not
represented in the nine‑gene linkage tester. Previous studies on crosses
of Florida teosinte with a stock including bm1 on this chromosome gave no indication
that it is involved in the four major segments.
The exact location of these segments and their
length is yet to be determined. The segment on chromosome 1 shows very weak
linkage with bm2 and
since previous experiments with Florida teosinte had shown one of the segments
to be strongly linked with P at
the opposite end it is probable that this segment involves part of the short
arm of chromosome 1. There is some crossing over within the segment.
The segment on chromoaome 3 shows 25‑30 per
cent of crossing over with A. This segnment is usually transmitted intact.
Crossing over, if it occurs at all, is not readily detectable.
The segment on chromosome 4 includes the Su locus. There is considerable crossing over (about
30 per cent) within the segment.
Nothing is known about the position of the segment
on chromosome 9, or the amount of crossing over which occurs within it.
The effects of the different segments are alike but
not identical. All reduce the size of the seeds, and the diameter of the ear.
All of them increase the prominence of the glumes and the number of ears
produced on a single plant. At least two of these segments contribute very
noticeably toward the reduction of number of rows of grain. In another
experiment single segments were first rendered heterozygous by crossing with the
original inbred strain, and the hybrid was then crossed with a second inbred to
produce a vigorous and uniform F1 in which approximately half of the
plants were heterozygous for the segment. Ears from plants heterozygous for the
segments average two rows of grain less than those which lacked the segments.
The segments have no discernible effect upon the
pairing of spikelets or response to length of day. It is probable that they
carry genes affecting these characteristics but that threshold limitations prevent
single spikes from appearing at these levels.
The corresponding segments derived from different
varieties of teosinte are similar in the nature and magnitude of their effects.
In each case the segment on chromosome 4 is the most "potent." In
each case this segment exhibits crossing over within the segment. Furthermore,
a stock derived from Florida teosinte and homozygous for the segment on
chromosome 4 is almost identical with a corresponding stock derived from
Nobogame teosinte. Differences in teosinte varieties are attributable to: (1)
Differences in the number of major segments; (2) the genetic nature of the
maize varieties into which they have become incorporated; and (3) the probable
presence of additional smaller segments or modifying factors.
We have some evidence that a single segment in
heterozygous condition can increase yields appreciably, the extent to which
this happens depending in part at least upon the kind of germ plasm with which
it is combined. Hybrids involving some inbred strains are noticeably improved
where small amounts of teosinte
germ plasm are included.
It has so far been impossible to detect these
segments cytologically. Stocks heterozygous for the segment on chromosome 4
occasionally exhibit a region of weak pairing on chromosome 4, but since
similar regions are found on other chromosomes little significance can be
attached to this. Apparently the segments are at least partly homologous to the
corresponding regions of maize chromosomes so that there is no regular and distinct
failure of pairing.
The new data seem to establish beyond any reasonable
doubt the hybrid nature of teosinte. At least the varieties so far studied are
nothing more than maize which has been contaminated by another species. The
contamination is not a random one but involves multiple‑factor segments
of four, or in the case of Nobogame teosinte, three chromosomes. These foreign
genes must have come either from Tripsacumm or from a "pure" variety
of teosinte now extinct or yet to be discovered.
P. C. Mangelsdorf
(Ed. note: In correspondence Dr. Mangelsdorf has
written, "I have an abundance of seeds of several nine‑gene multiple
testers and shall be glad to share it with anyone who wants some.")